The following is the Full Face Mountain Bike Helmet Comparison Guide: (See below the chart for the detailed buyers guide)
The 6 columns explained:
Make and Model with picture – click on the image or make and model for more information, reviews or purchase.
Material – This column displayed what the helmet is made of. See below for the benefits or drawbacks of the different materials.
Weight – This displays the weight of the helmet as disclosed by the manufacturer.
Certifications – This displays the different certification requirements it has met. The following are some of those certifications:
- CPSC – a standard needed to be met for the Consumer Protection Safety Commission. Don’t buy without this!
- ASTM F1952 – a standard for downhill mountain biking
- ASTM F2032 – a stardard for BMX biking
Price – $ is up to $100, $$ is from $101-$200, $$$ is from $201-$300, $$$$ is from $401-$500 and $$$$$ is $501 and above.
Rating – The rating is from 0 to 5, with 5 as being the highest. The ratings were obtained from Amazon.com and Jenson USA.
|T.H.E. Point 5 Helmet||ABS||38||CPSC||$||3.8|
|T.H.E. T2 Composite||Composite||36||CPSC||$||3.8|
|T.H.E. T2 Carbon Fiber||Carbon|
|Troy Lee Designs D3 Pinstripe||Carbon|
|37||CPSC 1203, EN 1077, CE EN1078, ASTM F1952, ASTM F2032, ASTM F2040||$$$$$||5.0|
|Troy Lee Designs D2 Delta||Composite||39||CPSC, EN 1078, ASTM F2032-00, and ASTM F1952||$$$||5.0|
|Giro Remedy||Fiberglass||37||CPSC, ASTM F1952||$||3.8|
|Troy Lee Designs D3 Thunder||Carbon|
|39||CPSC 2013, EN 1078, ASTM F1952, and ASTM F2040||$$$$$||5.0|
|Sixsixone Evo Carbon Camber||Carbon|
|34||CPSC, EN 1078, AS/NZS 2063||$$$||4.7|
|Fox Rampage Pro Carbon||Carbon|
|41||CPSC 1203, ASTM F1952, AS/NZS 2063:2008, EN 1078||$$$$$||4.5|
|Rockgardn White Pearl DH/FR||Fiberglass||39||CPSC, ASTM F1952||$$||4.5|
|Fox Rampage||Fiberglass||41||CPSC 1203, ASTM F1952, AS/NZS 2063: 2008, EN 1078||$$||4.4|
|Sixsixone Evo Wired||Fiberglass||39||CPSC, EN 1078, AS/NZS 2063||$$||4.0|
|Kali Savara DH||Fiberglass||39||CPSC, EN 1078||$||4.5|
|Sixsixone Comp Shifted||Polycarbonate||34||CPSC, EN 1078, AS/NZS 2063||$||4.5|
The Full Face Mountain Bike Helmet Buyers Guide
Full faced mountain bike helmets are becoming the standard for the best safety on dangerous mountain passes and downhill mountain biking. There are many helmets in various styles, colors and graphics, but for the full faced helmet that fits one’s needs it’s important to look beyond the graphics and paint. The following full face mountain bike helmet specifications are evaluated to guide buyers towards the best valued helmets for their riding needs.
The best uses for a full face mountain bike helmet includes downhill, freestyle and single track mountain biking. Each of these activities have different levels of difficulty, especially downhill racing. High speeds and increased obstacles are the elements that make downhill mountain bike racing dangerous, so full faced protection is a standard requirement. Single track riding takes greater stamina but the risks are generally similar to high speed downhill riding. The full faced helmet is used with neck and possible shin protection to help prevent serious injury on expeditious rides.
Materials and Styling:
Designed with keeping buying cost affordable, full faced helmets are constructed of lightweight material. The two most popular shell moldings of the helmet are fiberglass or carbon composite. Fiberglass helmets generally are less expensive and a great choice for riders whom never used full faced helmets for mountain biking. Carbon composite helmets are higher in initial cost, but offer unique styling benefits to compensate for the price. Both helmet styles are available in a variety of trim options to reflect individuality, but the interior styling of full faced helmets are what set them apart from traditional versions. Fiberglass full faced helmets feature interiors with suede micro liner and 11 to 15 ports allowing for breathable ventilation making comfort a non issue for owners of these helmets. Carbon composite helmets use quick release washable padding and custom fabrics to keep riders comfortable. Carbon helmets are more aerodynamic in shape with over 20 ventilation ports.
The standard full face mountain bike helmet’s shortcomings include being slightly oversized and not allowing for fitting with the popular protective neck braces. Fiberglass versions are notorious for extra bulk on the head and shoulders causing extra fatigue during a ride. Another issue owners have experienced is the visor not being long enough to protect from sunlight. These issues are noted but can be avoided by selection of other neck braces when riding and changing goggles to refract more sunlight than relying on the visor. The only downside to carbon composite helmets are that most consumers disagree with initial costs, but there are many affordable fiberglass options with similar safety ratings to select.
Costs & Final Evaluation:
Full faced helmets are recommended as comfortable, good-looking and effective means of skull protection at affordable costs. Fiberglass shelled helmets have an average entry price around $100 while carbon composite models are between $450-600 depending on manufacturer selection. The most important factor to remember above all features of mountain bike helmets is the value of one’s health. Each of these full faced helmet’s is an investment in one’s own personal safety. Choose wisely.